televising funerals
Published on June 9, 2004 By trina_p In Blogging
Okay - I get that Ronald Reagan was an important man for Americans (and Russians) I get that he led a very full life. He was in his 60's when he was President (oldest one) he was a movie star, he wrote nice love letters, and he died on Sunday age 93.

I can even understand why they're giving him a State funeral today and a National funeral on Friday (kidna) -- And I get why NBC in America is doing coverage of the whole thing commenting like it's a football game.

What I don't get is what it's got to do with us down under?

Ronald Reagan was President from 1981-1989 and I was born in 1983 - so I was 6 when Bush came to power and 10 when Clinton came into office. -- But at age zygote, 6 and 10 -- the only thing American I worried about was Sesame Street, Full House and later - the SImpsons.
The only recollection I have of the Gulf War was I was at my Grandma's house and I couldn't watch Sesame Street because of the War coverage.

Okay so that's me -- I'm only 21 - I don't have any connection to Reagan so I don't get why his funeral is being televised on my tv in Australia.
Our current PM has only been PM since 2001 - so HE never had any "dealings" with Reagan.

As far as I know there wasn't alot happening in Australia in the early 80's (expo 88 and commonwealth games excepted)
I'm not even sure Reagan's ever been to Australia.

So I just find it weird that Channel 7 has dedicated their morning slot to NBC's coverage of Reagan's funeral.

Then again I found it weird that Channel 9 dedicated their morning to coverage of David Hookes' funeral earlier this year.

As far as I know they've never done it to anyone else. Sir Donald Bradman didn't have a televised State Funeral when he died in 2001.
Victor Chang's funeral was not televised, neither was Shirly Strickland or Christina Cook (Australia's oldest woman died age 114) or even Alec Campbell (our last surviving ANZAC) Those people and more were honoured with State Funerals but they weren't televised

To my knowledge the only people who've had televised funerals in Australia while I've been alive were Princess Diana (all 4 Channels had round the clock coverage of that), David Hookes (channel 9) and today's Ronald Reagan (channel 7).
The Queen mother didn't have a televised funeral when she died. (last year?) Neither did her daughter Princess Margaret.
We didn't televise the funerals of the victims of Port Arthur, any of the backpacker murders or Jayden Leskie or even Threadbo.

So I ask you -If so many Australian's who passed on have done such great things to deserve a State or National Funeral but the hour or more that their funeral takes is not televised apart from maybe a 3minute segment on the news - What is so Important about David Hookes (my only guess is the way he died and the fact he was a donor) and more to the point -- What's so important (to Australian's) about Ronald Reagan.

Comments
on Jun 09, 2004
While I can not speak as to why your television chnnels there chose NOT to televise lionizations of other folks I can say for certain sure that had Ronald Reagan not been the man he was during your youth, the world you live in would be a much more evil place. Even down under.
on Jun 09, 2004
I suppose (from an American perspective) it's because Australia and the US are close allies. Beyond that, I'm not sure.

As I commented in a thread by Mugz, I never realized that Australia is influenced so greatly by what happens here in our little corner of the world. It's true that the US is a dominate entity in the world, so that may play some part, but it's most likely (IMHO) because the US and Australia are so closely tied.

We do share a great many things in common. Americans and Australians are both very independent peoples and countries. We share a common language (ok, well sort of) and we share common political interests. If I were Australian, I would likely be asking the same question. But then, that's just one more thing we share in common.
on Jun 10, 2004
i liked this even better than the midnight oil one. partly because i agree with you so passionately. i'm not denying that ronald reagan was a great president or even did great things for australia (i don't even really know if he did or didn't) but that small handful of australians you mentioned.... particularly people like australia's oldest woman or the port arthur victims, in my opinion deserve more recognition on national tv than a president of america.
on Jun 10, 2004
I can say for certain sure that had Ronald Reagan not been the man he was during your youth, the world you live in would be a much more evil place


Stay on target Greywar...

thats an assumption if ever I saw one... it really depends who you are talking to!! Australia *might* be a better place, but I would argue that Reagan really hurt the middle east and South America... but that's got nothing to do with this thread.... sorry Trina

I am really glad I am not the only one that feels this way... I was talking with a group of friends last night, and within 20 minutes were discussing the influx of American programming on our TVs... it seems to be an issue on a lot of peoples minds right now...

I just hope David Boon and Dean jones get nationally covered funerals!!!

Good article Trina

BAM!!!
on Jun 10, 2004
Mugz - if THE DON can't get a nationally televised funeral what makes you think David Boon will?
possibly Alan Border or Steve Waugh - You know Australian of the Year and all --- but hey so was Victor Chang -- that former Prime Minister who died a couple months ago didn't get a televised funeral --- I think you have to be killed in a fight with a bouncer to get on tv
(tongue in cheek)
on Jun 10, 2004
Our current PM has only been PM since 2001


Howard's been PM since 1996
on Jun 15, 2004
oh yeah - sorry 2nd term - to be honest politics in Aus has had very little effect on my life until now- I knew that (it's mistakes like that that take away all credibility) I got to vote in 2001 - I should have remembered.